The policy section, in one paragraph
A corporate travel policy's ground transportation section should state: when a black car is authorised (airport transfers; client and candidate pickups; pickups before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m.; travel with luggage or in groups; any trip where the traveller's safety or the company's duty of care requires a vetted driver); which vehicle classes each level may book (sedan as default; SUV for luggage or three or more; premium sedan for executives and clients; Sprinter for groups); the 407 rule (approved for addresses north of the 401, east of the DVP and west of the 427, or as the chauffeur judges); gratuity (set on the account at 15 per cent, or a cap for cash tips); the preferred supplier and why (licensed, GTAA-permitted, commercially insured, vetted chauffeurs, corporate account with itemised statements); receipts and coding (the account's statement with cost centres; individual receipts only when the account cannot be used); and the alternatives permitted when a car is not authorised (the UP Express, taxis, rideshare) and their limits. A model section is below.
Most Canadian companies' travel policies devote pages to airfare classes and hotel caps and a sentence to ground transportation — "use the most economical means" — which in practice means every traveller decides alone at the curb, the finance department reconciles a hundred emailed receipts, and nobody in the company can say who drove the executives or whether the vehicle was insured. A good ground transportation section is a page long, answers the questions travellers actually face, and produces a monthly statement instead of a shoebox. This article gives that section clause by clause: the authorisation rules and their rationale, the vehicle classes by seniority, the 407 and gratuity rules that remove decisions from the curb, the preferred-supplier clause and the vetting it should require, the receipts and coding, the duty-of-care rationale that makes the section a risk-management document rather than an expense one, the permitted alternatives, and a model text a company can adapt.

Clause one: when a black car is authorised
The policy should list the cases plainly, because "most economical" is not a rule. Airport transfers in either direction: a booked car with flight tracking is authorised, because the alternative for a traveller landing at 11 p.m. with a bag is a taxi queue or a surging app. Client, candidate and guest pickups: authorised with meet and greet, because the pickup is the company's first impression. Early and late hours: any pickup before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m., because transit and taxi availability fail then and the red-eye article explains why. Luggage, groups and multi-stop days: an SUV for luggage, a Sprinter for six or more, an hourly for a day of meetings, because the alternatives split the party or lose the hour. Safety: any trip where a traveller — alone at night, in an unfamiliar city, carrying company property — would be safer with a vetted, named driver; the duty of care article makes the case. Everything else: the permitted alternatives below.
Clause two: vehicle classes by seniority
The sedan is the default for all travellers; the SUV is authorised for luggage, three or more passengers, or child seats when a relocating family travels; the premium sedan (S-Class, 7 Series) for executives at a stated level and for client pickups; the Sprinter for groups of six to fourteen; stretch limousines and buses only for company events with a separate approval. The executive sedan vs luxury SUV article and the fleet page describe the classes, and a policy that names them saves a hundred emails.
Clause three: the 407 rule
The policy should decide the 407 once: approved for all airport and client trips to and from addresses north of the 401, east of the DVP and west of the 427 (or simply "as the chauffeur judges necessary"), with the toll appearing on the account's statement as a recoverable line; the 407 article explains the road and the corporate account billing article how the toll appears. A policy silent on the 407 produces travellers who decline it on principle and sit in a ninety-minute 401 on the company's time.
Clause four: gratuity
Set it on the account — 15 per cent on every trip, appearing on the statement — so that travellers carry no cash and tip no one twice; or, if the company prefers travellers to tip at their discretion, cap the reimbursable gratuity at 20 per cent and require it on the card receipt. The gratuity guide has the custom and the etiquette article the traveller's questions.

Clause five: the preferred supplier and its vetting
The policy should name a preferred supplier (or two) and state why: licensed by the City of Toronto as a limousine operator with a checkable number; every vehicle and chauffeur permitted by the GTAA; commercial automobile liability at a stated minimum with a certificate on file; chauffeurs vetted with record checks, abstracts and training, named on every confirmation; a corporate account with itemised monthly statements; dispatch staffed around the clock. The insurance and licensing article and the best limo service article give the questions the supplier must answer, and the policy should require that the answers be on file with the travel manager and reviewed annually.
Clause six: booking through the account
All authorised black car travel is booked on the company's corporate account — by the traveller, an assistant or the travel desk — with the cost centre or project code on each booking, so that the monthly statement carries the allocation and no individual receipt is needed; individual receipts are accepted only when the account could not be used (a city where the supplier does not operate, an emergency). The executive assistants' guide describes the booking in one line and the expense reports article the receipt when one is needed.
Clause seven: receipts, coding and HST
The account's statement is the receipt: traveller, date, route, class, fare, HST as a column (recoverable as an input tax credit), 407, waiting, gratuity, cost centre, reference; the finance department imports it and the corporate account billing article shows the format. The policy should state that ground transportation on the account is not expensed individually — it is already on the statement — and that a traveller who pays personally for an authorised trip attaches the itemised receipt with HST.
Clause eight: the permitted alternatives and their limits
When a black car is not authorised — a daytime downtown hop, a solo traveller with a carry-on at a good hour — the policy should say what is: the UP Express from Pearson (the UP Express comparison explains when it wins), licensed taxis, the rideshare apps with a note about surge and receipts, and public transit. It should also say what is not: unlicensed drivers, personal vehicles for client transport without the company's insurance review, and any vehicle for a client pickup that is not the preferred supplier's.
Clause nine: standing orders and regular travellers
Travellers who fly weekly should have a standing order on the account — booked once, adjusted by text — and the policy should say so, because a standing order is cheaper to administer than fifty bookings and more reliable on peak days; the consulting firms article describes the pattern.
Clause ten: events, groups and exceptions
Company events — a holiday party, an offsite, a board meeting — need their own approval and their own vehicles (buses, Sprinters, an hourly fleet), and the policy should route them to the travel desk rather than the individual traveller; the corporate holiday party article, the board meeting and AGM article and the conference transportation article describe the patterns. Exceptions — a traveller who needs a car outside the rules — go to a named approver, and the policy should say who.
The duty-of-care rationale
A ground transportation section is a risk document as much as an expense one: the company that puts its people in vetted, insured, tracked vehicles with named drivers can answer, after an incident, who drove whom, in what, insured by whom — and the company that told its people to "use the most economical means" cannot. The duty of care article makes the case in the terms risk managers use, and the policy's preamble should state it in a sentence.
A model section
Ground transportation. Employees are authorised to book chauffeured car service through the company's account with [preferred supplier] for: airport transfers; client, candidate and guest pickups (with meet and greet); any pickup before 7:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m.; travel with checked luggage, in groups of three or more, or involving multiple stops; and any trip where the employee's safety warrants a vetted driver. The default vehicle is the executive sedan; SUVs are authorised for luggage, three or more passengers or child seats; premium sedans for [level] and above and for client pickups; Sprinters for groups of six or more. The 407 ETR is approved for trips to and from addresses north of Highway 401, east of the DVP and west of Highway 427, at the chauffeur's judgment. A gratuity of 15% is set on the account; no cash gratuity is reimbursable. All such travel is booked on the account with a cost centre and is not expensed individually. Where car service is not authorised, employees may use the UP Express, licensed taxis, rideshare or public transit, and must attach itemised receipts. The travel manager holds the supplier's licence, permit, insurance and vetting documentation and reviews it annually. Exceptions require approval from [approver].
Policy section quick reference
| Clause | Rule | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Authorisation | Airports; client/candidate pickups; before 7 a.m./after 10 p.m.; luggage/groups/multi-stop; safety | Alternatives fail exactly then |
| Classes | Sedan default; SUV for luggage/3+; premium for executives/clients; Sprinter 6+ | Ends the class emails |
| 407 | Approved north of the 401, east of the DVP, west of the 427 | Travellers otherwise decline it and lose an hour |
| Gratuity | 15% on the account; or cap cash at 20% on receipt | No double tipping; no cash |
| Supplier | Licensed, GTAA-permitted, insured, vetted; documents on file, reviewed annually | Duty of care |
| Booking | On the account with a cost centre | Statement replaces receipts |
| Receipts | The statement; individual receipts only off-account | Reconciliation in an hour |
| Alternatives | UP Express, taxis, rideshare, transit where a car is not authorised | Honest economy |
| Standing orders | For weekly travellers | Cheaper to administer; reliable on peaks |
| Events / exceptions | Travel desk; named approver | Right vehicles; control |
Putting it in place
The corporate car service page opens the account that the section assumes; the duty of care article supplies the preamble; and a travel manager who sends us the draft section gets the supplier's documentation for the file the same day.
Relocations, new hires and the family clause
A policy should cover the relocating employee whose family arrives with children and luggage — an SUV with child seats for the airport pickup, an hourly for the house-hunting days, a standing order for the school run in the first month if the company offers it — because the relocation is when a company's ground transportation most shapes an employee's view of it; the families with luggage article and the child seats article cover the arrangements, and the profile on the account records the children's ages.
Reviewing the policy
A ground transportation section should be reviewed with the supplier's annual documentation: the year's statement summary shows what the 407 saved and cost, where the waiting charges fell (a traveller always late to the porte-cochère), which travellers' patterns want a standing order, and whether the class rules match how executives actually travel; the corporate account billing article describes the annual summary and the questions it answers.
Sustainability in the policy
Companies with emissions targets ask what a ground transportation policy can do: prefer the sedan to the SUV where luggage allows, prefer the UP Express for the solo carry-on traveller at a good hour (the policy already does), consolidate a delegation into a Sprinter rather than four sedans, and choose a supplier with hybrid and electric vehicles in the fleet; the black car service and the environment article sets out what a fleet can honestly claim and the hybrid and electric article what is on the road. A clause that says "sedan by default; Sprinter for groups; hybrid where available" is enough.






